Tuesday, November 19, 2013
"That's great," I said. "But I did have a question about all this: Where are you getting your data? I only ask because all the data I have says the exact opposite of what's in this message."
That question prompted a useful--and needed--conversation in which I shared my data and found out he didn't have any, but was working from anecdotal evidence. The idea that the public finds your profession unpopular is a sticky meme and an effective rallying cry. But I knew that pushing against a nonexistent myth wouldn't add luster to our reputation.
That's the premise behind Beyond Anecdote, an essay recently published in Inside Higher Ed that urges communicators at universities to be data collectors in an effort to combat decisionmaking-by-anecdote, in which programs get scrapped, signs get reformatted and initiatives are born because a trustee, donor, fellow staffer or faculty member has an anecdote to support the change. And if you know anything about statistics, an n of 1 is never valid.
My only complaint? The authors of this piece could have gone further, as they suggest data that can be collected on campus, metrics from existing efforts at the university. The smarter communicator fighting the tide of decisions by anecdote will need more ammo, and should be cultivating external data from government agencies, nonprofits, and independent research groups. Your research should include the full marketplace in which you exist--from the business world, the public sector, the nonprofit world and higher education. The data context in which decisions are made shouldn't stop at your own door.
(Photo from Oberazzi's photostream on Flickr)
It's nearly the end of the year. Are you leaving professional development or training money on the table? Email me at infoATdontgetcaughtDOTbiz to schedule individual or group training in public speaking, presenting, or social media; to prep for your upcoming TED or TEDx talk; or a communications retreat.
Posted by Denise Graveline at Tuesday, November 19, 2013