My money's on the savvy communicator to be at work now, so you can move fast, and speak authoritatively when your topic gets taken for a political ride (and you don't need to be in a political operation for this to happen). Here are a few resources and ideas to help:
- Speed your corrections by making them visual. Need to refute stretched facts, fast? One new study suggests that a visual approach to correcting political misinformation may be your best bet. Researchers asked study participants to assess three kinds of controversial data, on the U.S. troop "surge" in Iraq, the Obama administration's impact on jobs, and global climate change. Nieman Lab notes: "graphical presentation of corrections (and of controversial information in general) can be more powerful than their textual counterparts in terms of convincing people to amend their misperceptions." The post goes on to suggest prominent placement for infographics when presenting information on controversial topics.
- Take that a step further with a mapped visual: Make it easy for local reporters, regional public officials and supporters to find and feature your viewpoint by using a visual map to highlight the impact of a political proposal. Save the Post Offices has done just that, compiling a series of Google Maps highlighting where proposed closures of Post Office facilities would take place. It's a double-whammy: Immediate visual impact, with local data behind it, in one graphic.
- Get a key endorser who's not a "usual suspect:" One of the scientists who just did a star turn for research on a heretofore unknown "diamond planet" used his moment of celebrity to write a column noting how different his experience would have been had he been publishing data on climate change. His remove from the topic allows him to avoid the tag of bias in favor of his field, and he uses that to point out the similarities all sciences share in research and how it is conducted. Can you find someone to back up your points who's an astute observer--but not in the thick of the fight? Do it.
- Prep your spokespeople: It's often painfully obvious when experts aren't prepared for a media-coverage blitz occasioned by an offhand political comment or pointed debate argument. This past week, it's been difficult to avoid HPV researchers reiterating the basic facts about that vaccine, some more clearly and crisply than others. Take the time to identify your likely pinata topics, then get those spokesfolk ready by offering training, including a review of hot-button words and terminology that might get further taken out of context; help them brainstorm alternatives and strong messages that share the facts in a neutral way. I don't know any experts who would fail to welcome that extra help, even if it turns out to be unnecessary. Don't forget to hand them a variant of Ronald Reagan's best and least anxious debate line to counter broad, ridiculous charges: "There they go again."
- Challenge reporters to get beyond "he said, she said" coverage on controversial topics: Use this Jay Rosen post to urge them to get to the truth--especially if the truth is on your side.
- Learn how to correct a moving record on Twitter, which might be your fastest option to keep rumors in check. It helps if you've built strong followings on Twitter and your other social networks, long before you need them.