Heisel points out that reporters hesitate just as you might when thinking about asking for verification:
It seems rude and obtrusive, perhaps, to ask the parents of ill children to “prove” their stories by providing records. You don’t want to accuse them of lying about their case. Other writers don’t want to get involved with the details. They just want a quick quote to create the semblance of balance in the story. That’s why, after Brian Deer’s series about Andrew Wakefield’s discredited attempt to connect vaccines to autism appeared in the BMJ this month, parents of children with autism were allowed, unchallenged, to speak as authorities on the link between vaccines and autism all over the country....So there's another side to your responsibility as a communicator. Ask for verification of the story before you put it out into the wider world, certainly. But when a reporter comes to you with such an anecdote, work to find verification--and if it can't be found on your end, make sure that's abundantly clear in your statements. Have you run into this issue? What's your policy for handling it? (Hat tip to Ivan Oransky for sharing this on Twitter.)
Use the Evernote clip button, above, to save this post in an Evernote notebook. Subscribe to For Communications Directors, my free monthly newsletter, which features content before it appears here on the blog. If you do, you get discounts on registration for two upcoming workshops in February and March on networking online and on dynamic speaking skills.